<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Appdots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appdots.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog</link>
	<description>Programming for Mobile Platforms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:56:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Code Break! by Antoine of MMM</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/05/06/code-break/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine of MMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=327#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Brett; drop me an email and we can talk about setting up that lunch (Antoine of MMM) - your contact page&#039;s CAPTCHA is broken (using Google Chrome).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett; drop me an email and we can talk about setting up that lunch (Antoine of MMM) &#8211; your contact page&#8217;s CAPTCHA is broken (using Google Chrome).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What are you feeding your mind? by bugsy</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/04/03/what-are-you-feeding-your-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>bugsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=257#comment-17</guid>
		<description>i want that bacon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want that bacon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good News for the Lonely by Palm OS On WebOS - Take 2 &#124; Appdots</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/04/02/good-news-for-the-lonely/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Palm OS On WebOS - Take 2 &#124; Appdots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=254#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...]  Justin joked about the Palm OS being the ultimate undying mobile OS.  In many ways this is true.  For a while now, a company called StyleTap has created a Palm OS emulator that runs on Windows Mobile or Symbian.  I was actually very surprised at Palm’s announcement that it was a company other than StyleTap that would be developing the Classic app for WebOS.  At the same time, I am glad.  I have never had much luck with applications that use large database files on StyleTap.  But, this means that now Palm OS applications can be run on Symbian, Windows Mobile (Pro, Classic, and Standard), and now WebOS.  That sure is  a lot of market availability for a dying OS! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Justin joked about the Palm OS being the ultimate undying mobile OS.  In many ways this is true.  For a while now, a company called StyleTap has created a Palm OS emulator that runs on Windows Mobile or Symbian.  I was actually very surprised at Palm’s announcement that it was a company other than StyleTap that would be developing the Classic app for WebOS.  At the same time, I am glad.  I have never had much luck with applications that use large database files on StyleTap.  But, this means that now Palm OS applications can be run on Symbian, Windows Mobile (Pro, Classic, and Standard), and now WebOS.  That sure is  a lot of market availability for a dying OS! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Started with Windows Mobile by justin</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/03/30/getting-started-with-windows-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=203#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Nope, it&#039;s not.  I tested it out last night and it was actually worse than trying to get osx 10.5.5 running on a pc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, it&#8217;s not.  I tested it out last night and it was actually worse than trying to get osx 10.5.5 running on a pc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone 3.0 Downgrade Success Without Jailbreaking &#8211; The Missing Step by brett</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/03/27/iphone-30-downgrade-success-without-jailbreaking-the-missing-step/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=176#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Sorry I didn&#039;t clarify that I am using a PC and not a Mac. From what I hear, this process is much more difficult on the Mac, but I do not have one right now. If any other readers have tried this on a Mac and would like to share, that would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Sorry I didn&#8217;t clarify that I am using a PC and not a Mac. From what I hear, this process is much more difficult on the Mac, but I do not have one right now. If any other readers have tried this on a Mac and would like to share, that would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone 3.0 Downgrade Success Without Jailbreaking &#8211; The Missing Step by Chris Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/03/27/iphone-30-downgrade-success-without-jailbreaking-the-missing-step/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=176#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Humm, I&#039;m really interested in this method - I get through the iRecovery part - and get it to use 2.2.1 - and it&#039;s recognized in QuickPWN.

However, when i let it reboot &amp; restore  - I still get the 1013 error - am I not getting letting the Quick PWN go long enough before quitting?

If you could provide some specifics that would be great. 

-Chris-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humm, I&#8217;m really interested in this method &#8211; I get through the iRecovery part &#8211; and get it to use 2.2.1 &#8211; and it&#8217;s recognized in QuickPWN.</p>
<p>However, when i let it reboot &amp; restore  &#8211; I still get the 1013 error &#8211; am I not getting letting the Quick PWN go long enough before quitting?</p>
<p>If you could provide some specifics that would be great. </p>
<p>-Chris-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Started with Windows Mobile by Shiraz</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/03/30/getting-started-with-windows-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiraz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=203#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Just a comment about the Wine link:

Yeah, getting Visual Studio running with Wine is around the same level of annoyance as the Hackintosh Round 1 you did Justin.

If you&#039;re wanting to develop, just get a machine you can develop on natively without the headaches of special configuration. Ignore this if, like me, you actually enjoy banging your head against a wall on what a sane person would skip.

Granted, I&#039;ve not messed with Wine for 5 or so years, so it might work quite a bit easier now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a comment about the Wine link:</p>
<p>Yeah, getting Visual Studio running with Wine is around the same level of annoyance as the Hackintosh Round 1 you did Justin.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re wanting to develop, just get a machine you can develop on natively without the headaches of special configuration. Ignore this if, like me, you actually enjoy banging your head against a wall on what a sane person would skip.</p>
<p>Granted, I&#8217;ve not messed with Wine for 5 or so years, so it might work quite a bit easier now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Mobile Diversity A Good Thing? by Shiraz</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/03/30/is-mobile-diversity-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiraz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=217#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I believe MS is more concerned with the end user and less so with the 3rd party developers. That is a philosophy that will more than likely change in the not too distant future in light of the success of the iPhone and the App store. 

As to original design philosophy of Windows Mobile: Think they were trying to extend the standard Windows desktop/server experience to the mobile arena. Would have worked fine if the hardware manufacturers played along. Having all hardware built from the ground up with the OS is novel for a PC. I personally don&#039;t think it has done anything other than make Macs more expensive, but when you&#039;re limited by the level of hardware you have available building OS and hardware hand in hand winds up benefiting the developers considerably.

Of course, if hardware manufacturers worked on standardized drivers for their hardware running Windows Mobile, quite a bit of this head ache could be eliminated from the developer plate. Update the app to work with BLAH set of drivers and in theory, you&#039;re good to go.

Rambling again. Microsoft tries the clusterbomb approach to market share. Dumb it/Cheap it down to the point where Joe Average can acquire/use your product. Way more Joe Averages out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe MS is more concerned with the end user and less so with the 3rd party developers. That is a philosophy that will more than likely change in the not too distant future in light of the success of the iPhone and the App store. </p>
<p>As to original design philosophy of Windows Mobile: Think they were trying to extend the standard Windows desktop/server experience to the mobile arena. Would have worked fine if the hardware manufacturers played along. Having all hardware built from the ground up with the OS is novel for a PC. I personally don&#8217;t think it has done anything other than make Macs more expensive, but when you&#8217;re limited by the level of hardware you have available building OS and hardware hand in hand winds up benefiting the developers considerably.</p>
<p>Of course, if hardware manufacturers worked on standardized drivers for their hardware running Windows Mobile, quite a bit of this head ache could be eliminated from the developer plate. Update the app to work with BLAH set of drivers and in theory, you&#8217;re good to go.</p>
<p>Rambling again. Microsoft tries the clusterbomb approach to market share. Dumb it/Cheap it down to the point where Joe Average can acquire/use your product. Way more Joe Averages out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Mobile Diversity A Good Thing? by brett</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/03/30/is-mobile-diversity-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=217#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Microsoft gives the ODM (original device manufacturer) options and it is up to them to run with whatever form factors they can get the OS on.  It is a customer oriented thought process, but if developers are stuck supporting 15 different device formats, customer experience with software may vary from device to device.  That is bad for the entire platform in my opinion, but I&#039;m not sure what the answer is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft gives the ODM (original device manufacturer) options and it is up to them to run with whatever form factors they can get the OS on.  It is a customer oriented thought process, but if developers are stuck supporting 15 different device formats, customer experience with software may vary from device to device.  That is bad for the entire platform in my opinion, but I&#8217;m not sure what the answer is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Mobile Diversity A Good Thing? by justin</title>
		<link>http://www.appdots.com/blog/2009/03/30/is-mobile-diversity-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appdots.com/blog/?p=217#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Microsoft thinks they&#039;re doing us a favor when they separate out everything into 20 different &quot;confusing&quot; versions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Microsoft thinks they&#8217;re doing us a favor when they separate out everything into 20 different &#8220;confusing&#8221; versions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
